Mozilla Blocks All Versions of Flash in Its Browser “Firefox”

Good news for users of Firefox – now users are automatically protected from that dastardly new Flash bug that was stolen and weaponized recently. The parent company “Mozilla” decided that the best way to keep its users safe was to stop the Flash plugin from running in the browser. At least for now. It’s not the Flashpocalypse that some bloggers are making it out to be. Mozilla did not, indeed, "take Flash out behind the shed" and put a slug in it.

The fact of the matter is that this was the same old thing for Mozilla. They've blocked risky plugins — like Java, for instance — some time recently. It's all part of Mozilla's security technique. Once in a while, they say, security of the Firefox client base must be organized more than a consistent web experience. That is precisely what happened for this present week. A few high-seriousness Flash bugs were accounted for. One was stolen by programmers who penetrated the "security" firm Hacking Team and after that weaponized in short request by cyber criminals. Another appeared a couple of days after the fact that influenced all rendition of Flash, including the most recent, 18.0.0.209.

Hit a page that uses Flash at this moment with Firefox and you'll most likely see the outcome: a notice like the one at the highest point of this post. On the other hand, you may not see it.

On the off chance that you've skimmed Mozilla's bolster docs some time recently, you may have discovered one of their proposed remediations for Flash security issues: uproot it. You can likely get along fine and dandy without it, if not for all time in any event until Adobe squashes this most recent discriminating bug.

One day soon, ideally, Mozilla's Shumway task will work out as expected and you'll have the capacity to run Flash substance without the requirement for Adobe's plugin. That day can't come soon enough, and when it does, then features about Mozilla putting Flash out its hopelessness (or putting us out of Flash's wretchedness) will actually be true.

Share on Google Plus
    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment